[Users] Test results

[Erik Schnetter]

On Nov 22, 2013, at 10:47 , Frank Loeffler <knarf at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 06:41:55PM +0100, Ian Hinder wrote:
>> Erik and I have been working on automating the tests of the ET for the upcoming release.  The current status can be viewed (work in progress) here:
>> 
>> 	https://build.barrywardell.net/view/EinsteinToolkitMulti/job/EinsteinToolkitReport-sandbox/
> 
> Neat. On some of these machines I currently also run the tests because I
> didn't know about these. Oh well.
> 
>> These results are up-to-date as of now.  Shall I commit them to the
>> release-info repository (and continue to do so periodically)?
> 
> Please, as long as they are newer than existing results. However, with
> so many  failures on hopper and gordon, and also orca, we cannot mention
> them as 'supported'. Is the reason for this known? Kraken and BW are
> borderline as well, but the failing tests there are mostly not in
> critical thorns.

The reasons are not known. I briefly looked at Hopper; it seems the test cases segfault. That may have something to do with too aggressive optimization.

-erik

-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/

My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://pgp.mit.edu/.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20131122/e63f1a3f/attachment.bin