[Users] Wv reconstruction issue for PPM+Poly EoS

[Hee Il Kim]

Hi,

I made a parfile for the test just by modifying static_tov.par to induce
collpase. Please find the attached files. The figure shows manifest
difference between ppm+v vs. ppm+Wv reconstruction. For the case of
WENO+Ideal gas EOS, the two test lines show nice agreement.

Cheers,

Hee Il

2014-12-05 21:59 GMT+09:00 Roland Haas <roland.haas at physics.gatech.edu>:

> Hello Hee Il,
>
> > Yes, the routines of PPM for "poly" are highly suspicious. I can't make
> > comparisons for the different numbers but the star didn't rotate very
> fast.
> > The evolution pattern (e.g. rho.max) was different, resulting in a black
> > hole with an wrong mass, contrary to the case with the velocity
> > reconstruction. I'm sorry I can't continue the test at the moment but
> > MP5+Ideal EOS was also good without showing any difference.
> Ok. Would it be at all possible that you attach the actual parameter
> file that you used? it would be fine to remove analysis etc thorns but
> very nice if we had a parameter file that demonstrated the issue, so
> that test runs are possible.
>
> Yours,
> Roland
>
> --
> My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
> and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141209/a19d32e6/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: tov_test.par
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6402 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141209/a19d32e6/attachment-0001.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test_wv.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 56678 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20141209/a19d32e6/attachment-0001.jpg