[Users] McLachlan-rewrite has landed

[Erik Schnetter]

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Ian Hinder <ian.hinder at aei.mpg.de> wrote:

>
> On 24 Jul 2015, at 14:13, Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
>
> I just pushed all the changes related to the McLachlan-rewrite merge.
> Apart from the McLachlan Kranc scripts and the respective generated code,
> there are a few thorns that needed to have test results updated.
>
> I see zero test failures with these changes on Bethe, Blue Waters, Carver,
> Datura, Edison, Hopper, Mike, Nvidia (a Perimeter workstation), Philip,
> Queen Bee, Shelob, and Stampede.
>
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> It looks like there are some issues with backward compatibility.  I get
> this error:
>
> WARNING[L2,P0] (Cactus): ParameterSetKeyword: Unable to set
> keyword 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition', new value 'static' is not in
> any active range
> WARNING[L1,P0] (Cactus): Major error in parameter
> file '/lustre/datura/ianhin/simulations/einsteintoolkit/rewrite_ML_BSSN_bench_o4/output-0000/ML_BSSN_bench.par' line
> 30: Range error setting parameter 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition' to
> 'static'
>

Ian

I think you can use "scalar" instead, which sets the RHS to zero. We can
add a compatibility layer for this.

-erik

-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150724/2be5ba9c/attachment-0001.html