[Users] McLachlan-rewrite has landed

Erik Schnetter schnetter at cct.lsu.edu
Fri Jul 24 10:39:33 CDT 2015


On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Ian Hinder <ian.hinder at aei.mpg.de> wrote:

>
> On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:59, Ian Hinder <ian.hinder at aei.mpg.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 24 Jul 2015, at 14:13, Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
>
> I just pushed all the changes related to the McLachlan-rewrite merge.
> Apart from the McLachlan Kranc scripts and the respective generated code,
> there are a few thorns that needed to have test results updated.
>
> I see zero test failures with these changes on Bethe, Blue Waters, Carver,
> Datura, Edison, Hopper, Mike, Nvidia (a Perimeter workstation), Philip,
> Queen Bee, Shelob, and Stampede.
>
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> It looks like there are some issues with backward compatibility.  I get
> this error:
>
> WARNING[L2,P0] (Cactus): ParameterSetKeyword: Unable to set
> keyword 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition', new value 'static' is not in
> any active range
> WARNING[L1,P0] (Cactus): Major error in parameter
> file '/lustre/datura/ianhin/simulations/einsteintoolkit/rewrite_ML_BSSN_bench_o4/output-0000/ML_BSSN_bench.par' line
> 30: Range error setting parameter 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition' to
> 'static'
>
>
> Also, any output parameters referring to the old variables are now
> invalid; e.g. phi has been renamed phiW.  Given this, it looks like old
> parameter files will very likely all have to be modified for the new
> version.
>

Ian

Yes, this is correct. You suggested renaming "phiW" to "cf" in the ticket
-- if so, now would be the time to do so to avoid two subsequent renamings.

-erik

-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150724/8ee91f76/attachment.html 


More information about the Users mailing list