[Users] ET on KNL.

[Hee Il Kim]

Hi,

Thanks Roland. So, the issue of Intel compiler was fixed? No upgrade of
Vector thorn is required? Please take a look at my previous post.
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/2016-November/005097.html

Hee Il



2017-02-23 7:53 GMT+09:00 Haas, Roland <rhaas at illinois.edu>:

> Hello Eloisa,
>
> yup, widely off. David with Erik's help had a try at ET on KNL (stampede)
> and you can find some information here: https://docs.einsteintoolkit.
> org/et-docs/2017_MHD_Workshop
>
> Yours,
> Roland
>
> --
> My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
> and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: users-bounces at einsteintoolkit.org [users-bounces at einsteintoolkit.org]
> on behalf of Eloisa Bentivegna [eloisa.bentivegna at ct.infn.it]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 16:24
> To: Einstein Toolkit Users
> Subject: [Users] ET on KNL.
>
> Dear all,
>
> I was wondering if anybody is using the ET on the Knights Landing
> architecture, and what sort of performance one could expect to get.
> Admittedly without much optimization, I am measuring a performance per
> core which is almost two orders of magnitude smaller than that of a
> Broadwell Xeon. Does this sound wildly off?
>
> Eloisa
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at einsteintoolkit.org
> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at einsteintoolkit.org
> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170223/6689559c/attachment.html