[Users] ML_ADMQuantities question

[Erik Schnetter]

The way I would remedy the situation is:

- look at the Mathematica source file for thorn ML_ADMQuantities
- remove the declaration of the external ML_BSSN variables
- peek at thorn ML_BSSN to find how these are defined in terms of the
ADM variables, and insert this definition where needed, e.g.
calculating det g from g_ij instead of from W

For someone familiar with Kranc that should be straightforward, and
not more difficult than creating a second version that attaches itself
to ML_CCZ4.

-erik


On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
> As written, thorn ML_ADMQuantities requires another thorn with the
> name ML_BSSN to be present.
>
> -erik
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 7:52 AM, Wolfgang Kastaun <physik at fangwolg.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/04/2018 01:14 AM, Roland Haas wrote:
>>> Hello Wolfgang,
>>>
>>>> @Roland: In the interface.ccl of ML_ADMConstraints I only see the ADM
>>>> constraints, no expressions for ADM energy and angular momentum. Or did
>>>> you mean something else?
>>> I meant ML_ADMConstraint but did not check its interface.ccl. If they
>>> are not there then I have no better suggestion than Erik. Are the
>>> changes from BSSN to ccZ4 or Z4c more than just "replace K with K+X"?
>>>
>>
>> As far as I remember, the BSSN variables are also present in the CCZ4
>> system, with differences only in the case of constraint violating states.
>>
>>> Yours,
>>> Roland
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/



-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/