[Users] Summatiobyparts compilation failure on ARA cluster (latest ET release)

[Peter Diener]

hi Roland,

FPPFLAGS=-traditional

was included in the optionlist that Andrea attached to the e-mail.

Cheers,

   Peter

On Friday 2018-11-16 15:17, Roland Haas wrote:

>Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:17:08
>From: Roland Haas <rhaas at illinois.edu>
>To: Peter Diener <diener at cct.lsu.edu>
>Cc: Erik Schnetter <schnetter at protonmail.com>,
>    Andrea Endrizzi <aendrizzi7 at gmail.com>,
>    Einstein Toolkit Users <users at einsteintoolkit.org>
>Subject: Re: [Users] Summatiobyparts compilation failure on ARA cluster (latest
>     ET release)
>
> Hello all,
>
> this is just a blind guess but I have seen various strange Fortan
> compiler errors if one forgets to include "-traditional" in the FPPFLAGS
> options in the option list.
>
> If you do not set FPPFLAGS at all then you should be good since the
> default includes it, however if you eg have
>
> FPPFLAGS=-DFOO
>
> then you have to change it to be
>
> FPPFLAGS=-DFOO -traditional
>
> Yours,
> Roland
>
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>> The error message points to line 11 in the source file, which is the
>> line that contains
>>
>> DECLARE_CCTK_FUNCTIONS
>>
>> This is expanded by a C-preprocessor before being handed of to the
>> compiler.
>>
>> The preprocessed file can be found in the directory:
>>
>> /home/wa65fop/CS_Wu/THC_ZM1/Cactus/configs/<your config name>/build/SummationByParts
>>
>> and is named Derivatives_2_1.f90.
>>
>> It seems like the C-preprocessor is not expanding
>> "DECLARE_CCTK_FUNCTIONS" correctly and that the preprocessed file
>> contains a line like:
>>
>>    end interface                                 &   interface
>>
>> which is clearly not valid fortran. Can you check your preprocessed file
>> and verify that this is indeed present?
>>
>> I don't see anything obviously wrong with your preprocessor flags, but
>> why is there a
>> -I/opt/intel/compilers_and_libraries_2018.0.128/linux/mpi/intel64/include
>> in your CPPFLAGS in you options file?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>    Peter
>>
>> On Friday 2018-11-16 11:08, Erik Schnetter wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:08:48
>>> From: Erik Schnetter <schnetter at protonmail.com>
>>> To: Andrea Endrizzi <aendrizzi7 at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Einstein Toolkit Users <users at einsteintoolkit.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Users] Summatiobyparts compilation failure on ARA cluster (latest
>>>     ET release)
>>>
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>> The error message quotes a line that is not and should not be present
>>> in the source code. I wonder whether maybe your source file has
>>> somehow become corrupted?
>>>
>>> Can you attach the file
>>> /home/wa65fop/CS_Wu/THC_ZM1/Cactus/arrangements/CactusNumerical/SummationByParts/src/Derivatives_2_1.F90
>>> from your source tree, as well as the preprecessed file
>>> /home/wa65fop/CS_Wu/THC_ZM1/Cactus/configs/whiskyTHC_ZM1/build/SummationByParts/Derivatives_2_1.f90?
>>>
>>> -erik
>>>
>>>> On Nov 16, 2018, at 1:51 , Andrea Endrizzi <aendrizzi7 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Good morning,
>>>>   I was trying to compile ET on ARA cluster, specifically with the
>>>> latest intel compilers (2018, Update 3). All the C/C++ code compiled
>>>> nicely, but when reaching the SummationByParts thorn, the file
>>>> Derivatives_2_1.F90 failed (attached is a .txt of the error). I never
>>>> saw this kind of error before when compiling previous versions of ET,
>>>> but it seems to complain about syntax in a file that looked ok when I
>>>> opened the source. Could it be related to the compiler/the compiler's
>>>> flags I'm using? If that may be the case, I also attach the .cfg file
>>>> I'm using (architecture of the nodes is Skylake). I am currently
>>>> trying to build with a previous version, to check whether it is
>>>> version-related or just a problem on my side.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks already for your attention!
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Andrea Endrizzi
>>>> <error_report_summationbyparts.txt><ara-skl-icc_v0.1.cfg>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Erik Schnetter <schnetter at protonmail.com>
>>> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at einsteintoolkit.org
>> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> -- 
> My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
> and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net.
>