[Users] ET and recent Intel compilers

[Hee Il Kim]

Hi,

As James Healy mentioned in the post "[Users] Einstein Toolkit and modern
AMD supercomputer", I found static_tov.par passed the test for the Intel
issue. So some bns-generic codes would make NaNs. But less probable because
the only bns-generic code would be NSTracker but I've already encountered
the NaN production issue w/wo NSTracker.

NaNChecker itself could be suspected but both bns and tove tests are using
NaNChecker.

Rather, it could be a generic issue of Intel compiler. There are some bugs
reported and new features in handling NaNs for the case of ifx. Those look
just irrelevant yet.

Hee Il
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20210901/0b418d27/attachment.html