[Users] how to review a contribution guideline

[Erik Schnetter]

Gabriele

This is an excellent idea.

My usual criteria would be:
- needs to have a "getting started" document
- needs to have example output that can be reproduced
A gallery example implies both.

-erik


On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 11:17 AM Roland Haas <rhaas at illinois.edu> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Since I am serving as release manager for the upcoming release and
> could not find this information collated in a single location I started
> to draft a reviewer's guide for contributions (slightly different from
> the how to review a patch guide
> https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/How_to_Review_a_Patch that
> already existed):
>
> https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/How_to_Review_a_new_component
>
> Comments and contributions (you may have to send email first to have an
> account on the wiki created) would be very welcome.
>
> Yours,
> Roland
>
> --
> My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
> and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://pgp.mit.edu .
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at einsteintoolkit.org
> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at gmail.com>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/