Dear all,
please find the minutes for today's meeting below and on our wiki:
https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/Cosmology_and_Particles
@Katy: thanks for taking them!
We decided to have a call once a month on a Monday around 4:30pm (GMT),
i.e., after the regular Einstein Toolkit call.
The next call takes place on 23rd April 2018 where Katy will give us an
introduction to GRChombo (see http://www.grchombo.org/ ) which is now
publicly available.
cheers,
Helvi
-----
Minutes
Participants: Sante Carloni, Katy Clough, Michele Grasso, Bishop Mongwane,
Erik Schnetter, Daniele Vernieri, Helvi Witek
- Timing for regular meeting
-
- Agreed that we will aim to meet once a month on Mondays at 4.30pm
GMT / 5.30pm CET time
- Agreed that having a 20 minute discussion on a specific topic at
each call is a good idea to give a focus to the call
- Next meeting will be on 23rd April, with 20 minute discussion on
GRChombo numerical relativity code
- Horndeski theories
- DV gave an introduction to Horndeski theories, which are the most
general theories with an additional scalar field leading to second order
field equations.
- The original Horndeski paper was published in 1973 but the theory
was rediscovered in 2010 in the the equivalent context of
Galileons, after
which it became more popular in research
- The field equations can be simplified (a little!) by writing them
in terms of 4 arbitrary functions of the field phi and the
kinetic term X.
- Covers a number of common modified gravity theories - f(R),
Brans-Dicke, Gauss-Bonnet.
- Recent measurements of GWs have been used to show (PRL 119 251302,
2017) that, given that the speed of propagation of GWs is c (to very high
precision), several terms in the most general action must be set to zero.
This may rule out the Vainstein screening mechanism.
- Some work is being done to investigate the well-posedness of the
equations, (see https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10155,
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.04370.pdf), which is crucial for their
numerical formulation and evolution, but so far they have only been shown
to be weakly hyperbolic. This may, however, be due to issues around gauge
choices.
===========================================
Dr. Helvi Witek
Royal Society University Research Fellow
Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology
Department of Physics
King's College London
===========================================
Dear all,
just a reminder for our working group call tomorrow, 19th March 2018, at
4:30pm (UTC, i.e. UK/Portugal) / 5:30pm (CET).
Please consider joining via the google hangout:
https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/tce4j4gzcfcormnadoauiqcvg4e
Daniele Vernieri kindly agreed to give us a brief introduction on Horndeski
theories, the most general scalar-tensor theories yielding second order
field equations that are particularly popular in cosmology.
If you have any suggestions for topics, please add them to the meeting
agenda:
https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/Cosmology_and_Particles
cheers,
Helvi
===========================================
Dr. Helvi Witek
Royal Society University Research Fellow
Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology
Department of Physics
King's College London
===========================================
Dear all,
let us pick up our previous discussion in a next working group call. I
would suggest next week or the week after, and created a new doodle poll to
identify the most convenient times. Please fill it in until the end of the
week:
https://doodle.com/poll/7qdvevduu2k6ezac
If you have any suggestions for topics, please add them to the meeting
agenda:
https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/Cosmology_and_Particles
Daniele Vernieri kindly agreed to give us a brief introduction on Horndeski
theories, the most general scalar-tensor theories yielding second order
field equations that are particularly popular in cosmology.
Best wishes,
Helvi
===========================================
Dr. Helvi Witek
Royal Society University Research Fellow
Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology
Department of Physics
King's College London
===========================================
hi all,
For people who don't know me, Elo and I and some other colleagues
organised a small workshop in Torun in July 2017 on the cosmology side
of GR, with one of the hot questions being whether or not dark energy
is just a misinterpretation of forcing an oversimplified (FLRW)
family of metrics onto cosmological observations:
http://cosmo.torun.pl/cosmotorun17_prog.html
We are still far from consensus in answering this question - and ET is likely
to play a major role.
I haven't (yet) used ET non-trivially yet, although it's high on my
priority list. As I presently understand it, the questions of what is
Newtonian vs what is GR vs what is a numerically and analytically
reliable calculation are presently a lot less-well resolved than
published-paper abstracts often claim. My group's results (all
software is free-licensed, see my pdf in the workshop proceedings
above and follow the links) favour a quite easy production of the
"extra" 16% expansion (scale factor) required at the present epoch to
match observations (with an LCDM proxy), by taking structure formation
into account. The relevant length scale is close to the standard
extragalactic non-linear scale, a few Mpc, established observationally
since the 1980s.
Apologies if the following is off-topic, but we have an inhomogeneous
cosmology postdoc position available here at Nicolaus Copernicus
University with an application deadline of 6 April 2018:
https://euraxess.ec.europa.eu/jobs/278463
Cheers
Boud