[Users] trac components

Frank Loeffler knarf at cct.lsu.edu
Mon Dec 6 09:02:47 CST 2010

On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:58:45AM -0600, Steven R. Brandt wrote:
> Do we have to call them components? Given that we're touting Cactus
> as a component-based framework in which the components are the
> thorns it seems awkward to use component for a group of thorns.

'Components' is a trac-terminology. But even if that would not be the
case, there are non-Cactus components like the website, simfactory or
GetComponents - and hopefully also some non-Cactus codes in the future,
so I think we should avoid calling this thorns or arrangements.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101206/0a240454/attachment.bin 

More information about the Users mailing list