[Users] trac components

Erik Schnetter schnetter at cct.lsu.edu
Mon Dec 6 10:18:18 CST 2010

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Frank Loeffler <knarf at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:58:45AM -0600, Steven R. Brandt wrote:
>> Do we have to call them components? Given that we're touting Cactus
>> as a component-based framework in which the components are the
>> thorns it seems awkward to use component for a group of thorns.
> 'Components' is a trac-terminology. But even if that would not be the
> case, there are non-Cactus components like the website, simfactory or
> GetComponents - and hopefully also some non-Cactus codes in the future,
> so I think we should avoid calling this thorns or arrangements.

Subsystem? Problem area? Module? Unit? Section?

Of these, I like "section" best.


Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>   http://www.cct.lsu.edu/~eschnett/

More information about the Users mailing list