[Users] Propose thorns for inclusion in the EinsteinToolkit

[Barry Wardell]

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Ian Hinder <ian.hinder at aei.mpg.de> wrote:

> I believe the requirements for inclusion should be that the code has tests
> and documentation, is considered by an independent reviewer to be of
> sufficiently high quality, and is expected to be generally useful.  I think
> all we are missing is documentation and the independent reviewer
> (volunteers?).
>

What type of documentation is required? Currently there is only a basic
README file. Should there also be some sort of Cactus documentation which
describes the arrangement/thorns? Is there anything more than this needed?

Barry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120424/47e7ebac/attachment.html