[Users] Spurious test failures due to now bboxset code in Carpet

[Erik Schnetter]

On Jan 20, 2015, at 14:06 , Roland Haas <roland.haas at physics.gatech.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
>> We recently put some work into making the ASCII output from the tests
>> the same independent of the number of processes that they are run on.
>> This used the fact that the output ordering of components from Carpet
>> was the same under certain conditions.  This was using the old
>> bboxset class.  Do you know if the new bboxset class has the same
>> property?
> If we regenerate for the new code but have some machines where it does
> not run, this will imply that the tests will fail on those machines, yes.

I updated the old bboxset class to explicitly sort the bboxes. Both are now using the same ordering.

-erik

--
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at gmail.com>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/

My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from https://sks-keyservers.net.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150120/a15e5d92/attachment.bin