[Users] Spurious test failures due to now bboxset code in Carpet

[Ian Hinder]

On 20 Jan 2015, at 20:14, Erik Schnetter <schnetter at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 20, 2015, at 14:06 , Roland Haas <roland.haas at physics.gatech.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello all,
>> 
>>> We recently put some work into making the ASCII output from the tests
>>> the same independent of the number of processes that they are run on.
>>> This used the fact that the output ordering of components from Carpet
>>> was the same under certain conditions.  This was using the old
>>> bboxset class.  Do you know if the new bboxset class has the same
>>> property?
>> If we regenerate for the new code but have some machines where it does
>> not run, this will imply that the tests will fail on those machines, yes.
> 
> I updated the old bboxset class to explicitly sort the bboxes. Both are now using the same ordering.

Do you know why only one test showed a difference?  
-- 
Ian Hinder
http://members.aei.mpg.de/ianhin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150120/0f899ea4/attachment.bin