[Users] Reformatting Carpet's source code

[Erik Schnetter]

Well, let's start small then. I suggested Carpet since it is smaller than
Cactus, or all of the ET. But maybe we should start out even smaller --
maybe with one of the CactusUtils thorns. Let's pick Formaline; this one
has a formatting that's different from almost all other thorns anyway, and
it doesn't see much development.

-erik

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Roland Haas <rhaas at aei.mpg.de> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> > Anyway -- we should easily be able to all use the same version of
> > clang-format.
> Easily: Weeellll maybe.
>
> On my workstation using Debian (testing) the only version that I can
> easily use are: 3.4 and 3.5 . On my OSX laptop Homebrew installs a
> version that identifies as 3.7 (no other version provided it seems, at
> least brew search clang-format only finds the one formula). One should
> be able to compile clang-format from scratch, I have never done so though.
>
> I'd normally suggest to try this (now since it is at the beginning of a
> release lifetime) and see how well we fare. However I don't know how one
> would "undo" the use of automatic formatting of the repository during
> the testing stage if we end up not liking the results.
>
> Yours,
> Roland
>
>
> --
> My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
> and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at einsteintoolkit.org
> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>


-- 
Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150708/2f514183/attachment.html