[Users] McLachlan-rewrite has landed

[Ian Hinder]

On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:59, Ian Hinder <ian.hinder at aei.mpg.de> wrote:

> 
> On 24 Jul 2015, at 14:13, Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
> 
>> I just pushed all the changes related to the McLachlan-rewrite merge. Apart from the McLachlan Kranc scripts and the respective generated code, there are a few thorns that needed to have test results updated.
>> 
>> I see zero test failures with these changes on Bethe, Blue Waters, Carver, Datura, Edison, Hopper, Mike, Nvidia (a Perimeter workstation), Philip, Queen Bee, Shelob, and Stampede.
> 
> Hi Erik,
> 
> It looks like there are some issues with backward compatibility.  I get this error:
> 
> WARNING[L2,P0] (Cactus): ParameterSetKeyword: Unable to set keyword 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition', new value 'static' is not in any active range
> WARNING[L1,P0] (Cactus): Major error in parameter file '/lustre/datura/ianhin/simulations/einsteintoolkit/rewrite_ML_BSSN_bench_o4/output-0000/ML_BSSN_bench.par' line 30: Range error setting parameter 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition' to 'static'

Also, any output parameters referring to the old variables are now invalid; e.g. phi has been renamed phiW.  Given this, it looks like old parameter files will very likely all have to be modified for the new version.

-- 
Ian Hinder
http://members.aei.mpg.de/ianhin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150724/91d1835e/attachment.html