[Users] McLachlan-rewrite has landed

Ian Hinder ian.hinder at aei.mpg.de
Fri Jul 24 10:23:39 CDT 2015


On 24 Jul 2015, at 17:04, Ian Hinder <ian.hinder at aei.mpg.de> wrote:

> 
> On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:59, Ian Hinder <ian.hinder at aei.mpg.de> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 24 Jul 2015, at 14:13, Erik Schnetter <schnetter at cct.lsu.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> I just pushed all the changes related to the McLachlan-rewrite merge. Apart from the McLachlan Kranc scripts and the respective generated code, there are a few thorns that needed to have test results updated.
>>> 
>>> I see zero test failures with these changes on Bethe, Blue Waters, Carver, Datura, Edison, Hopper, Mike, Nvidia (a Perimeter workstation), Philip, Queen Bee, Shelob, and Stampede.
>> 
>> Hi Erik,
>> 
>> It looks like there are some issues with backward compatibility.  I get this error:
>> 
>> WARNING[L2,P0] (Cactus): ParameterSetKeyword: Unable to set keyword 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition', new value 'static' is not in any active range
>> WARNING[L1,P0] (Cactus): Major error in parameter file '/lustre/datura/ianhin/simulations/einsteintoolkit/rewrite_ML_BSSN_bench_o4/output-0000/ML_BSSN_bench.par' line 30: Range error setting parameter 'ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition' to 'static'
> 
> Also, any output parameters referring to the old variables are now invalid; e.g. phi has been renamed phiW.  Given this, it looks like old parameter files will very likely all have to be modified for the new version.

Hi Erik,

Something is wrong with the merge: the merge commit should have two parents, but it only has one.  

	https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/mclachlan/commits/all

It looks like the "merge" is just a set of changes on the master branch.

-- 
Ian Hinder
http://members.aei.mpg.de/ianhin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20150724/ad910eec/attachment.html 


More information about the Users mailing list