[Users] LORENE BHNS Initial Data

[Frank Loeffler]

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:51:40PM +0200, Gwyneth Allwright wrote:
>Apparently one needs the development version of Lapack for a successful
>Lorene compilation (http://www.lorene.obspm.fr/prerequisites.html), but I
>think I only have the December 2016 release. I'll see if adding the
>development version makes a difference.

Hi,

A note on terminology here: what Lorene means with "development version" 
is the package that includes the header files, not a version still in 
development. If you were to install Lapack by hand you usually get both,
but distributions often split them because the majority of users only 
ever needs the library itself. You only need the header files if you 
compile against the library, not if you only run something that uses it.

Thus, a release from last year is perfectly fine. Depending on what 
distribution you use, "development" packages (meant for development 
using them) are sometimes called package-dev or package-devel.

Frank

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170314/c82394e2/attachment.bin