[Users] Fwd: Re: meeting minutes for 2020-02-06
Steven R. Brandt
sbrandt at cct.lsu.edu
Thu Feb 13 12:49:27 CST 2020
What command did you use to build? Did you use simfactory?
Did you install all the prerequisites? I.e. what do you see when you
type "which gfortran" or "which mpirun"?
--Steve
On 2/13/2020 2:46 PM, Bilal Hameed wrote:
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> I am using ET_RELEASE = ET_2019_10 in Ubuntu 18.04. Sir I am
> trying to run module weylscale4. This module needs a thorn named
> "Iosurfacer". I have this thorn's folder in cactus/repos/pughio but
> this thorn is not included in thornlist So when I try to include it
> for my example it gives following error,
>
> CST error in /home/bilal/Cactus/lib/sbin/CST (at 376)
> -> Missing thorn cactuspughio/IsoSurfacer
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> /home/bilal/Cactus/lib/make/make.configuration:214: recipe for target
> '/home/bilal/Cactus/configs/weyl/config-data/make.thornlist' failed
> make[1]: ***
> [/home/bilal/Cactus/configs/weyl/config-data/make.thornlist] Error 1
> Makefile:256: recipe for target 'weyl' failed
> make: *** [weyl] Error 2
>
> On 13/2/20 12:39 AM, Steven R. Brandt wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bilal, I assume by "ADM" you mean "EinsteinBase::ADMBase?"
>>
>> Can you tell us (1) what operating system you're on, (2) what version
>> of the einstein toolkit you're using? (3) show us the exact error
>> message? (4) show us what command you are using to compile?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --Steve
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [Users] meeting minutes for 2020-02-06
>> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:35:06 +0500
>> From: bilal hameed awan <bilalhameedawan962 at gmail.com>
>> To: Steven R. Brandt <sbrandt at cct.lsu.edu>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Brandt Sir,
>> Sir I am trying to run module weylscal4. I
>> get an error missing thorn "ADM", issue is I can't find any thorn
>> ..../ADM in thornlist.
>> Please help me.
>>
>> Regards
>> Bilal Hameed.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020, 9:29 PM Steven R. Brandt <sbrandt at cct.lsu.edu
>> <mailto:sbrandt at cct.lsu.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> OK, I have this imported from SVN:
>> https://github.com/EinsteinToolkit/cactuscode
>>
>> Some of you already have commit rights on it. I'm happy to have more.
>>
>> We apparently have a docker image in
>> https://github.com/stevenrbrandt/et-websites already... and
>> apparently I made it, though I don't remember doing so. Maybe I'm
>> older than I think.
>>
>> What I need is someone to help with the content.
>>
>> --Steve
>>
>> On 2/11/2020 10:04 AM, Steven R. Brandt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/11/2020 8:21 AM, Ian Hinder wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 10 Feb 2020, at 16:37, Steven R. Brandt
>>>>> <sbrandt at cct.lsu.edu <mailto:sbrandt at cct.lsu.edu>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So the question is, what do we do about the website? We don't
>>>>> have the time, person-power, or budget to maintain it. At
>>>>> present, the website is full of things that are horribly out
>>>>> of date and likely does more harm than good for anyone reading it.
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Steve,
>>>>
>>>> For time, person power and budget, how would this change if it
>>>> were moved to be under the ET website?
>>>
>>> I don't have a dollar or hour figure, but the svn repo is
>>> maintained by CCT, which sits on a server which has to be
>>> upgraded from time to time and there are svn client server
>>> version issues, etc. Similar issues apply to the webserver. The
>>> machine has to be upgraded from time to time, which includes
>>> going and getting new docs, etc. If we put a webserver on github
>>> and served cactuscode.org <http://cactuscode.org> out of a
>>> docker image like we do for the ET, that would simplify upgrades
>>> and refreshing. It would also help us to document what the
>>> website does and make it possible to host it elsewhere if that
>>> ever becomes necessary or desirable.
>>>
>>> My belief is that if we want to keep a cactuscode.org
>>> <http://cactuscode.org> website, we should all help in updating
>>> it and making it worthwhile.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is the issue related to keeping the content up-to-date, or
>>>> infrastructure issues like maintaining a separate webserver etc?
>>> Mostly, it's keeping the content relevant, but the website
>>> updated and running is a bit of a hassle too.
>>>>
>>>> Deleting content which is out of date would help.
>>> Right, but there's a lot of content and I don't have the time to
>>> go through it all--I don't think anyone does. I think we need to
>>> ask what the minimum thing is that we want. What are the
>>> critical set of pages?
>>>>>
>>>>> We could make a website that's just a few well-chosen pages
>>>>> with a similar template to the ETK.
>>>>>
>>>> Reducing the amount of administrative duplication is certainly
>>>> desirable.
>>>
>>> It's more than desirable IMHO, it's necessary. Also, in recent
>>> months we've been working to decentralize administration and
>>> make sure that more than one person knows how to keep various
>>> things running. This is another opportunity to continue that trend.
>>>
>>> --Steve
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ian**Hinder
>>>> Research Software Engineer
>>>> University of Manchester, UK
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at einsteintoolkit.org <mailto:Users at einsteintoolkit.org>
>> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20200213/405eff79/attachment.html
More information about the Users
mailing list