[Users] Out-Dated Code Version Error

[NTS Preparation]

Dear Roland,
Sir, the outdated variables and refinement levels are related? I am
bit confused because same warnings are there for 8 refinement levels.
Precisely, I wanna ask is there any alternative to using old version for
encountering out-dated variables.

Regards,
Bilal Hameed.


On Thu, Jan 14, 2021, 1:04 AM Roland Haas <rhaas at illinois.edu> wrote:

> Hello Karima,
>
> I don't think you can reduce the number of refinement levels by quite
> that much. You need to have at least ~24 points across the radius of
> the black hole which is about the size of its mass.
>
> So for a black hole of unit mass 1. you will need to have a resolution
> of 1./24. on the finest grid and each finer grid has twice the
> resolution of the coarsest grid.
>
> I don't know what GetComponent failures you were getting but the old
> thornlist refers to old svn servers that use outdated SSL libraries and
> newer operating systems will refuse to talk to them.
>
> You may be able to download the code using an virtual machine (or
> docker image) using Ubuntu 16.04 which still talks to those old SSL
> libraries.
>
> Yours,
> Roland
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > There is a spinning single BH evolution example inside (Cactus
> Cactus/par/arXiv-1111.3344/kerr/by-a0.7.par) which is using the code
> version 2010. I am trying to simulate it using the newest version of the
> ETK with the only changes of refinement levels (reduced to 3) in the
> parameter file. It is giving some warnings and suggestions to change the
> out-dated parameters ( LapseAdvectionCoeff, ShiftAdvectionCoeff) along with
> the boundary condition to set as usual (what it means?). I also tried using
> the suggested parameters, but the data output is not as expected
> (incomplete output data), probably because of these out-dated parameters
> (?), the output and the error files are attached. I am asking if there are
> any alternatives (solutions) to these parameters, or should I prefer using
> the old ETK version, 2010?  In the latter case, I am again encountering the
> download error,  pasted below. Likewise, I want to get around this issue as
> well. I assume this email contains multi issues, but they are co-related,
> sorry to put them in one post.
> >
> >
> > ./GetComponents --parallel
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/manifest/raw/ET_2010_06/einsteintoolkit.th__;!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORYP9QSta$
> <
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://einsteintoolkit.th/__;!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORV5BJMIo$
> >
> > Note: I have tried without using the "--parallel option"  as well, but
> the same error persists.
> >
> > Error: No definition for ET_RELEASE found in input file or ENV.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > CalledProcessError                        Traceback (most recent call
> last)
> > <ipython-input-26-9fa64924ebf0> in <module>
> > ----> 1 get_ipython().run_cell_magic('bash', '', './GetComponents
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/manifest/raw/ET_2010_06/einsteintoolkit.th*5Cn__;JQ!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORQtZW0Ik$
> '<
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/manifest/raw/ET_2010_06/einsteintoolkit.th/n__;!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORYyh5V47$
> '>)
> >
> > ~/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py in
> run_cell_magic(self, magic_name, line, cell)
> >    2369             with self.builtin_trap:
> >    2370                 args = (magic_arg_s, cell)
> > -> 2371                 result = fn(*args, **kwargs)
> >    2372             return result
> >    2373
> >
> > ~/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/IPython/core/magics/script.py in
> named_script_magic(line, cell)
> >     140             else:
> >     141                 line = script
> > --> 142             return self.shebang(line, cell)
> >     143
> >     144         # write a basic docstring:
> >
> > <decorator-gen-110> in shebang(self, line, cell)
> >
> > ~/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/IPython/core/magic.py in
> <lambda>(f, *a, **k)
> >     185     # but it's overkill for just that one bit of state.
> >     186     def magic_deco(arg):
> > --> 187         call = lambda f, *a, **k: f(*a, **k)
> >     188
> >     189         if callable(arg):
> >
> > ~/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/IPython/core/magics/script.py in
> shebang(self, line, cell)
> >     243             sys.stderr.flush()
> >     244         if args.raise_error and p.returncode!=0:
> > --> 245             raise CalledProcessError(p.returncode, cell,
> output=out, stderr=err)
> >     246
> >     247     def _run_script(self, p, cell, to_close):
> >
> > CalledProcessError: Command 'b'./GetComponents
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/manifest/raw/ET_2010_06/einsteintoolkit.th*5Cn__;JQ!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORQtZW0Ik$
> ''<
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/manifest/raw/ET_2010_06/einsteintoolkit.th/n__;!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORYyh5V47$
> ''> returned non-zero exit status 25.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any kind of assistance would highly be appreciated and worthwhile.
> >
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Karima S
> >
>
>
> --
> My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting
> and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://pgp.mit.edu .
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at einsteintoolkit.org
> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20210114/3a16473a/attachment.html