#590: McLachlan should allow other thorns to set the gauge
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: bmundim | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn | Version:
Keywords: |
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
The parameters lapse_evolution_method and shift_evolution_method are
usually set to ML_BSSN in McLachlan. However they are never checked
in the code. McLachlan indeed seems to ignore their values and
overwrite whatever the values of lapse or shift set elsewhere,
preventing therefore other thorns from setting them differently.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/590>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
#1215: Source browsing not working
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: hinder | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: EinsteinToolkit trac | Version:
Keywords: |
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
The repositories in the "Browse source" TRAC interface
(https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/browser) are not being updated. The
last Cactus flesh commit visible there is from 10 months ago.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/1215>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
#849: Drop explicit support for Fortran 77 in Cactus
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: eschnett | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Cactus | Version:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
I suggest to drop explicit support for Fortran 77 in Cactus. Fortran 77
is, for all practical purposes, a subset of Fortran 90, and thus Fortran
77 code can be compiled by Fortran 90 compilers.
There is currently no platform that has a Fortran 77 and no Fortran 90
compiler, and there is no Fortran source code in Cactus that cannot be
compiled by a Fortran 90 compiler.
In a way, supporting Fortran 77 as language is similar to supporting K&R C
as a language. We don't do this either.
I suggest to remove/ignore all configuration options regarding Fortran 77,
and to compile .f77 and .F77 files with a Fortran 90 compiler. This change
will simplify the configuration stage of Cactus. I don't expect any user
to notice.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/849>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
#882: Create ThornGuideHTML target
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: eschnett | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Cactus | Version:
Keywords: |
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Barry Wardell suggests: The only issue is that there doesn't seem to be a
HTML version of the configuration specific ThornGuide make target, so we
should add this as a target at the same time as removing the patch. I'd
imagine this would just be a matter of copy-and-paste from the existing
ThornGuideHTML target.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/882>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
#1117: Wrong CarpetIOASCII headers for complex 2D output.
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: reisswig@… | Type: defect
Status: new | Priority: minor
Milestone: | Component: Other
Version: | Keywords:
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
I am outputting a 2d _complex_ array (called "extracted_vars") using 2d
CarpetIOASCII output.
Using the standard output format, the data starts at column 13.
So the first array element "extracted_vars[0]" is at column 13.
Now, since I have a complex array, the second element,
"extracted_vars[1]", must be at column 15 (column 14 contains the
imaginary part of element [0]). In older versions of Carpet, this was
reported correctly in the header. In the current version, it is incorrect.
The second element, "extracted_vars[1]" is reported to be in column 14
instead of 15.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/1117>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
#542: Remove thorn CactusArchive/ADM from thorn list
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: eschnett | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn | Version:
Keywords: |
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Remove thorn CactusArchive/ADM from thorn list. This thorn is outdated,
and we should updated out test cases instead. It also takes a long time
and a lot of memory to compile.
If we want an ADM formulation (which is doubtful since we don't use it
ourselves), we should implement one via Kranc.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/542>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
#114: per-variable tolerances for Cactus testsuites
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: knarf | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: ET_2011_06
Component: Cactus | Version:
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
It would be nice to be able to specify per-variable testsuite tolerances
in Cactus (per regexp for the name in the ideal case).
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/114>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
#1266: Featue request for Parity Symmetry thorn
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: yosef@… | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: Other | Version:
Keywords: |
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
I started looking at runs with parity symmetry, that is the only
symmetry is the simultaneous reflection about x, y, and z. I think
I was able to "implement" this symmetry by changing just a handful of
lines in Rotating180 and I'm a little less sure about my changes to
carpetregrid2. I was wondering, would there be any interest in adding
this symmetry to ET?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/1266>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit
#995: used shared memory on a node to share EOS table
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: rhaas | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn | Version:
Keywords: EOS_Omni |
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
the attached patch has processes on the same node share the memory to
store the EOS table. It required a patch to the flesh to detect the shared
memory support functions in the OS.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/995>
Einstein Toolkit <http://einsteintoolkit.org>
The Einstein Toolkit