Trac April 2025

trac@lists.einsteintoolkit.org

1 participants
28 discussions

#2863: simfactory does not correctly handle non existing files
by Roland Haas 14 Apr '25

14 Apr '25

#2863: simfactory does not correctly handle non existing files Reporter: Roland Haas Status: resolved Milestone: Version: Type: bug Priority: major Component: SimFactory Changes (by Roland Haas): status: resolved (was open) Comment (by Roland Haas): Applied as git hash [1ce74c50](https://bitbucket.org/simfactory/simfactory2/commits/1ce74c50b80c… "simlib: make failure to read file fatal" of [simfactory2](https://bitbucket.org/simfactory/simfactory2) -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2863/simfactory-does-n…

1 0

#2633: SummationByPart's Diff_gv aliased function does ont document which part of the grid the computed derivative is valid
by Peter Diener 10 Apr '25

10 Apr '25

#2633: SummationByPart's Diff_gv aliased function does ont document which part of the grid the computed derivative is valid Reporter: Roland Haas Status: closed Milestone: Version: Type: bug Priority: minor Component: Changes (by Peter Diener): status: closed (was resolved) Comment (by Peter Diener): Documentation updated. -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2633/summationbyparts-…

1 0

#2633: SummationByPart's Diff_gv aliased function does ont document which part of the grid the computed derivative is valid
by Peter Diener 10 Apr '25

10 Apr '25

#2633: SummationByPart's Diff_gv aliased function does ont document which part of the grid the computed derivative is valid Reporter: Roland Haas Status: resolved Milestone: Version: Type: bug Priority: minor Component: Changes (by Peter Diener): status: resolved (was new) Comment (by Peter Diener): Documentation updated to describe the behavior. -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2633/summationbyparts-…

1 0

#2633: SummationByPart's Diff_gv aliased function does ont document which part of the grid the computed derivative is valid
by Peter Diener 10 Apr '25

10 Apr '25

#2633: SummationByPart's Diff_gv aliased function does ont document which part of the grid the computed derivative is valid Reporter: Roland Haas Status: new Milestone: Version: Type: bug Priority: minor Component: Comment (by Peter Diener): The documentations have been updated. -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2633/summationbyparts-…

1 0

#2861: Running qc0 with CarpetX
by Alejandra Gonzalez 07 Apr '25

07 Apr '25

#2861: Running qc0 with CarpetX Reporter: Alejandra Gonzalez Status: open Milestone: Version: Type: bug Priority: major Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn Comment (by Alejandra Gonzalez): Hi Lucas, It seems it’s just a warning, since there don’t seem to be errors shown in the output for the AH and the waveform \(which I’m also able to visualize without issues\). However I haven’t been able to visualize the silo and punturetracker output. For the silo files I try to open them with VisIt but it keeps showing errors so I can’t read anything \(I’m outputting the same variable as your parfile ,\`ADMBaseX::alp\`\). As for the puncture tracker, seeing the files by hand they seem to have sane numbers but I don’t really understand what all those indices are for each coordinate. It’s mostly probably me not understanding how the output is structured I fear, rather than maybe there’s a bug in the code. Thanks again! ‌ -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2861/running-qc0-with-…

1 0

#2861: Running qc0 with CarpetX
by Lucas Timotheo Sanches 03 Apr '25

03 Apr '25

#2861: Running qc0 with CarpetX Reporter: Alejandra Gonzalez Status: open Milestone: Version: Type: bug Priority: major Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn Comment (by Lucas Timotheo Sanches): Hello Alejandra. Good to hear that things seem to be working out. Regarding your warning, it is difficult to say. Dos it crash your simulation at any point or is it just a warning? Can you check the output from `PunctureTracker` to verify that the puncture locations reported at least make sense? Regarding subcycling, I’m not a specialist and not really sure since the feature is quite new. You should probably open a new ticket with that question, or better yet, send your question to the mailing list so that we can forward it to the the appropriate developpers. -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2861/running-qc0-with-…

1 0

#2861: Running qc0 with CarpetX
by Alejandra Gonzalez 01 Apr '25

01 Apr '25

#2861: Running qc0 with CarpetX Reporter: Alejandra Gonzalez Status: open Milestone: Version: Type: bug Priority: major Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn Comment (by Alejandra Gonzalez): Also, how can I call the subcycling feature \(from [https://inspirehep.net/literature/2899822](https://inspirehep.net/literatur…) in the parfile? -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2861/running-qc0-with-…

1 0

#2861: Running qc0 with CarpetX
by Alejandra Gonzalez 01 Apr '25

01 Apr '25

#2861: Running qc0 with CarpetX Reporter: Alejandra Gonzalez Status: open Milestone: Version: Type: bug Priority: major Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn Comment (by Alejandra Gonzalez): This warning message appears every time with that parfile though: ``` WARNING[L1,P6] (CarpetX): Before reduction: Grid function "TWOPUNCTURESX::puncture_u" is invalid on patch 0, refinement level 5, time level 0; required: The interior is valid. The outer boundary is invalid. The ghost zones are invalid. , found: The interior is invalid because: RemakeLevel. The outer boundary is invalid because: RemakeLevel. The ghost zones are invalid because: RemakeLevel. ``` Is this something to be concerned about? -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2861/running-qc0-with-…

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

Trac April 2025