#2789: Citation suggestion for Kranc

Reporter: Zach Etienne Status: new Milestone: Version: Type: enhancement Priority: trivial Component: EinsteinToolkit website

Comment (by Ian Hinder):

It is old and outdated, but I don’t think that’s a good reason to omit it. I’m not sure what the logic was - maybe we were trying to avoid asking people to cite too many things? I can’t think of a reason not to cite the Kranc paper now. @{557058:56049c54-f8c2-4b6c-9b88-ab697c967495} @{557058:f7fd5133-6eee-4385-a5e5-3e03342a0b24} do you remember any details of this decision?

‌

-- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2789/citation-suggestio...