#2004: example in New User Tutorial maybe wrong --------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: b.gabella@… | Owner: Bill Gabella Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: Other | Version: development version Keywords: | --------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Running the static_tov.par that comes in the ETK_2016_11, I see different results for the two plots hydrobase-rho.maximum and admbase-lapse.minimum. See the mail list post Users Digest, Vol 83, Issue 3 on 1 Feb 2017 at 3:10pm.
New User Tutorial https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/Tutorial_for_New_Users
bill e.g.
#2004: example in New User Tutorial maybe wrong ---------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Reporter: b.gabella@… | Owner: Bill Gabella Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: Other | Version: development version Resolution: | Keywords: ---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by rhaas):
Are you following the https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et- docs/Tutorial_for_New_Users or the https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et- docs/Simplified_Tutorial_for_New_Users ? The latter produces plots like the one you showed to have obtained while the former produced the (gray) plots you show on the right of your screenshots.
Since https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/Tutorial_for_New_Users requires access to QueenBee and we do not have the ability to generate new user accounts anymore, that test likely has not been tested in quite a while.
One would have to run it on some other machine to see what happens.
trac@lists.einsteintoolkit.org