#1111: Missing fortran compiler prevents CCTK_REAL8 from being defined. ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: sbrandt | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: ET_2012_11 Component: Cactus | Version: Cactus_4.0.0 Resolution: | Keywords: ----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
Comment (by knarf):
It works if F77/F90 are set to 'none' or it is unset. So, this problem only appears if the user did specify something as fortran compiler but that doesn't work. Thus, I think it is warrented to downgrade this ticket; please revert if you disagree.
However, the ticket itself should be left open because it is still an error.
In the case above you see in the configure output quite some warnings about things going wrong: {{{ Unknown Linux f90 compiler 'dfadf'. Please add appropriate information to /home/knarf/Cactus/lib/make/known-architectures/linux and send the updated file to CactusMaint We will try anyway ... }}} and {{{ Determining number of fortran underscores... Compiling test file with sdfsa -fopenmp -g -fcray-pointer -m128bit-long- double ... Failed to compile fname_test.f Creating null fortran name conversion routine Compiling test file with dfadf -fopenmp -g -fcray-pointer -m128bit-long- double ... Failed to compile fname_test.f Creating null fortran common name conversion routine. Fortran compilation failed ... COMPILATION WILL FAIL WITH ANY FORTRAN SOURCE CODE }}}
One part of the problem is close to line 1121 in lib/make/configure.in: {{{ if test -n "$CCTK_REAL8" -a ( "x$F77" = 'xnone' -o ( "x$cctk_cv_have_fortran_real8" -a "x$cctk_cv_have_fortran_complex16" = 'xyes' ) ); then AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(CCTK_REAL8, $CCTK_REAL8) AC_DEFINE(HAVE_CCTK_REAL8) fi }}}
In short: only define CCTK_REAL8 is C did find it and if either fortran did as well or F77 is set to 'none'.
Now the question is how to best handle this case. The user specified a non-working Fortran compiler (or used a standard option list but doesn't have the compiler installed). I suggest to let configure fail at the point of {{{ COMPILATION WILL FAIL WITH ANY FORTRAN SOURCE CODE }}} with hints to either correct the F77/F90 entries in the optionlist or to either not set them or set them to 'none' of indeed no Fortran compiler is needed.
The following patch implements the message, but the return value of that script isn't checked for, so a patch aborting configure at that stage would need to be either at another place or more invasive.
{{{ Index: configure.pl =================================================================== --- configure.pl (revision 4902) +++ configure.pl (working copy) @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ { print "Fortran compilation failed ...\n"; print "COMPILATION WILL FAIL WITH ANY FORTRAN SOURCE CODE\n"; + print " ! Apparently a Fortran compiler was specified (F77/F90), but it does not \n". + " ! seem to be working. Either make sure to specify a working Fortran compiler, \n". + " ! do not set F77/F90, or set them to 'none'.\n\n"; }
sub test_fortran_name }}}