#1633: backport MoL revision 225 ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: rhaas | Owner: Type: defect | Status: review Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: Other | Version: development version Resolution: | Keywords: MoL backport ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Comment (by knarf):
Why is MoLDebug used here? If this triggers, the code aborts anyway. I don't see harm in outputting too much information in that case. Also, please make the message a bit more "official". "Arg" is cute and all, but maybe you could think of something better? :)
Could CCTK_ERROR be used instead of CCTK_WARN(0, ?