Re: [ET Trac] [Einstein Toolkit] #747: 9th order prolongation test fails with REAL_PRECISION=4

#747: 9th order prolongation test fails with REAL_PRECISION=4 ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: hinder | Owner: eschnett Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Carpet | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------

Comment (by eschnett):

Right, it should be epsilon, not min.

4/7 sound like a very fine-tuned choice. What about 100*eps^(3/4)? Or maybe a lookup table, manually choosing 1e-12 and 1e-4? Or maybe we want 1e+3*eps, acknowledging that we lose 3 digits in our calculations.