Trac

trac@lists.einsteintoolkit.org

8708 discussions

#2172: Test "Binary black hole GW150914" example
by Roland Haas 29 Apr '21

29 Apr '21

#2172: Test "Binary black hole GW150914" example Reporter: Roland Haas Status: open Milestone: ET_2021_05 Version: development version Type: task Priority: major Component: EinsteinToolkit website Comment (by Roland Haas): In today’s ET call, [https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/Meeting\_agenda#2021-04-29](https:…, the issue of adding presync parameters was discussed and it was decided to try adding: ```c++ Cactus::presync_mode = "mixed-error" ``` to all gallery parfiles. -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2172/test-binary-black…

1 0

#2516: Different simulation result with different number of cores setting
by Ken Hui 29 Apr '21

29 Apr '21

#2516: Different simulation result with different number of cores setting Reporter: Status: open Milestone: Version: ET_2019_10 Type: bug Priority: major Component: Comment (by Ken Hui): I had been trying to slightly change the parameter settings to check what the problem is related to. I realised that if I allow more space between the different refinement levels, i.e. changing the “radius” of CarpetRegrid2, I can now generate pretty much the same result with different number of cores. ``` CarpetRegrid2::radius_2[1] =240.0 CarpetRegrid2::radius_2[2] =120.0 CarpetRegrid2::radius_2[3] = 52.0 ===> 64 !!!!!! CarpetRegrid2::radius_2[4] = 40.0 CarpetRegrid2::radius_2[5] = 30.0 ===> 28 !!!!!! ``` Originally I thought the coarser levels only needs to cover the finer levels \+ 12 points for buffer, allowing a buffer zone of 16 points somehow solves the problem. In my setup, the resolution dx in the first few finest levels are 0.7M, 1.4M, etc; and I have reset the “radius” accordingly by * **28** \+ 0.7 \* \(16 points buffer\) = 39.2 < 40 \(next level radius\) * **40** \+ 1.4 \* 16 = 62.4 < 64 * **64** \+ 2.8 \* 16 = 108.8 < 120 However for the BNS benchmark run \(nsnstohmns\), I do not see difference in simulation results with different number of cores by putting the refinement levels around the stars closer to each other, this makes me wonder if the above “radius” settings were really the cause. Any comments or updates on this issue are appreciated! -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2516/different-simulat…

1 0

#2524: Zenodo page shows only 2015 ET grants
by Roland Haas 28 Apr '21

28 Apr '21

#2524: Zenodo page shows only 2015 ET grants Reporter: Roland Haas Status: new Milestone: Version: development version Type: bug Priority: major Component: EinsteinToolkit website -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2524/zenodo-page-shows…

1 0

#2175: Test "Single, stable neutron star" example
by Peter Diener 27 Apr '21

27 Apr '21

#2175: Test "Single, stable neutron star" example Reporter: Roland Haas Status: open Milestone: ET_2021_05 Version: development version Type: task Priority: major Component: EinsteinToolkit website Comment (by Peter Diener): I have run the gallery par file with the current development version of the toolkit and get results identical to the previous release. -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2175/test-single-stabl…

1 0

#2487: *_evolution_method = "LeanBSSNMoL" in Lean does nothing
by Gabriele Bozzola 26 Apr '21

26 Apr '21

#2487: *_evolution_method = "LeanBSSNMoL" in Lean does nothing Reporter: Gabriele Bozzola Status: open Milestone: Version: development version Type: bug Priority: major Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn Comment (by Gabriele Bozzola): I think I’ve done it, but I’ve never used BitBucket for these things, so I hope everything will be okay. ‌ -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2487/_evolution_method…

1 0

#2487: *_evolution_method = "LeanBSSNMoL" in Lean does nothing
by Miguel Zilhão 26 Apr '21

26 Apr '21

#2487: *_evolution_method = "LeanBSSNMoL" in Lean does nothing Reporter: Gabriele Bozzola Status: open Milestone: Version: development version Type: bug Priority: major Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn Comment (by Miguel Zilhão): If you can do the rebasing it would be great – thanks. I’ll review everything afterwards. -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2487/_evolution_method…

1 0

#2487: *_evolution_method = "LeanBSSNMoL" in Lean does nothing
by Gabriele Bozzola 26 Apr '21

26 Apr '21

#2487: *_evolution_method = "LeanBSSNMoL" in Lean does nothing Reporter: Gabriele Bozzola Status: open Milestone: Version: development version Type: bug Priority: major Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn Comment (by Gabriele Bozzola): I submitted a PR. There’s some minor rebasing that needs to be done. Do you want me to do it, or are you going to do it when you review the changes? -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2487/_evolution_method…

1 0

#2523: The trac mailing list could have more useful content
by Roland Haas 26 Apr '21

26 Apr '21

#2523: The trac mailing list could have more useful content Reporter: Gabriele Bozzola Status: resolved Milestone: Version: development version Type: enhancement Priority: minor Component: Other Changes (by Roland Haas): status: resolved (was new) -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2523/the-trac-mailing-…

1 0

#2523: The trac mailing list could have more useful content
by Gabriele Bozzola 26 Apr '21

26 Apr '21

#2523: The trac mailing list could have more useful content Reporter: Gabriele Bozzola Status: new Milestone: Version: development version Type: enhancement Priority: minor Component: Other Comment (by Gabriele Bozzola): Perfect! Thanks! ![](https://bitbucket.org/repo/8zBLME5/images/3970645639-2021-04-26:07:36:20.png) ‌ -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2523/the-trac-mailing-…

1 0

#2487: *_evolution_method = "LeanBSSNMoL" in Lean does nothing
by Miguel Zilhão 26 Apr '21

26 Apr '21

#2487: *_evolution_method = "LeanBSSNMoL" in Lean does nothing Reporter: Gabriele Bozzola Status: open Milestone: Version: development version Type: bug Priority: major Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn Comment (by Miguel Zilhão): Thanks for this. I had a quick look and it seems fine. I’ll check things more carefully once I have some more time. Gabriele, can you submit a PR? -- Ticket URL: https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/tickets/issues/2487/_evolution_method…

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

Trac