#1504: MoL RK87 non-functional ------------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Reporter: rhaas | Owner: Type: defect | Status: reviewed_ok Priority: major | Milestone: Component: EinsteinToolkit thorn | Version: development version Resolution: | Keywords: MoL ------------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Changes (by rhaas):
* status: review => reviewed_ok
Comment:
Yes, I think the lesson to learn from this is to make sure we have better test coverage. The RK87 method is apparently used, I suspect because it is a variable timestep method and variable timesteps are only useful with PUGH. This actually worked before and we missed the regression in the review :-).
Did we already agree on a way to tag fixes for backporting? Using "Please backport" in the ticket? Adding a "Backport" keyword?