Users March 2021

users@lists.einsteintoolkit.org

19 participants
28 discussions

Re: [Users] Compilation Error related to rdwr.pl script
by Michael Muller 01 Apr '21

01 Apr '21

Hello, Thank you for your quick reply and sorry for my late one. I was going through our code to see if I could find the source of the problem and I was able to locate it. The schedule.ccl file in one of our thorns created the problem. One of the functions that was declared in there was assigning "F90" to the "LANG" keyword, instead of the two options C and FORTRAN. And the function in rdwr.pl seems to check for those two keyword-options and generates an error message if neither is used, if I understood correctly. The latter was the case, where the scheduling declaration looked something like that: *** SCHEDULE function_name IN group_name AFTER other_function_name { LANG: F90 } "do some important stuff" *** I hope this helps. Thank you! Michael ________________________________ Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 14:49:02 -0500 From: Steven Brandt <sbrandt(a)cct.lsu.edu> Subject: Re: [Users] Compilation Error related to rdwr.pl script To: users(a)einsteintoolkit.org Message-ID: <6902d061-3fb8-5c8a-63ae-e9955323e2a3(a)cct.lsu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Hello. Can you show me the source code which exposed this problem in rdwr.pl? Thanks. --Steve On 3/26/2021 2:46 PM, Michael Muller wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am a new user of the Einstein Toolkit and I am currently trying to > build the ET deWitt-Morette release with some private thorns. The > private thorns were previously used with the ET Mayer release, so > there are some components that are not quite compatible with the new > release and at least one creates an error related to the new rdwr.pl > script. The problem is that the function in line 471 of rdwr.pl that > would create the error message seems to have a problem with the input > that it gets. Thus the actual error message pointing to the error in > the private thorn never gets printed. The exact error message is: > > "Can't call method "linenum" on unblessed reference at > /home/mmuller/ET_DeWittMorette_2020_11/Cactus/repos/flesh/lib/sbin/rdwr.pl > line 471. > /home/mmuller/ET_DeWittMorette_2020_11/Cactus/lib/make/make.configuration:212: > recipe for target > '/home/mmuller/ET_DeWittMorette_2020_11/Cactus/configs/ET_DeWitt_Morette_privGRHydro/config-data/make.thornlist' > failed > make[1]: *** > [/home/mmuller/ET_DeWittMorette_2020_11/Cactus/configs/ET_DeWitt_Morette_privGRHydro/config-data/make.thornlist] > Error 25 > Makefile:260: recipe for target 'ET_DeWitt_Morette_privGRHydro' failed > make: *** [ET_DeWitt_Morette_privGRHydro] Error 2" > > This error shows up just after the configuration scripts for the > thorns have run. I also included a copy of the full build output in > the attachments. > > It would be great if anyone could provide me with any pointers as to > what could be the source of this problem. > > Thank you and all the best, > Michael Müller > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)einsteintoolkit.org > http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users

2 1

Einstein Toolkit Meeting Reminder
by users＠einsteintoolkit.org 31 Mar '21

31 Mar '21

1 0

Agenda for Thursday's Meeting
by users＠einsteintoolkit.org 29 Mar '21

29 Mar '21

Please update the Wiki with agenda items for Thursday's meeting. Thanks! https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/meeting_agenda --The Maintainers

1 0

Compilation Error related to rdwr.pl script
by Michael Muller 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

Hello everyone, I am a new user of the Einstein Toolkit and I am currently trying to build the ET deWitt-Morette release with some private thorns. The private thorns were previously used with the ET Mayer release, so there are some components that are not quite compatible with the new release and at least one creates an error related to the new rdwr.pl script. The problem is that the function in line 471 of rdwr.pl that would create the error message seems to have a problem with the input that it gets. Thus the actual error message pointing to the error in the private thorn never gets printed. The exact error message is: "Can't call method "linenum" on unblessed reference at /home/mmuller/ET_DeWittMorette_2020_11/Cactus/repos/flesh/lib/sbin/rdwr.pl line 471. /home/mmuller/ET_DeWittMorette_2020_11/Cactus/lib/make/make.configuration:212: recipe for target '/home/mmuller/ET_DeWittMorette_2020_11/Cactus/configs/ET_DeWitt_Morette_privGRHydro/config-data/make.thornlist' failed make[1]: *** [/home/mmuller/ET_DeWittMorette_2020_11/Cactus/configs/ET_DeWitt_Morette_privGRHydro/config-data/make.thornlist] Error 25 Makefile:260: recipe for target 'ET_DeWitt_Morette_privGRHydro' failed make: *** [ET_DeWitt_Morette_privGRHydro] Error 2" This error shows up just after the configuration scripts for the thorns have run. I also included a copy of the full build output in the attachments. It would be great if anyone could provide me with any pointers as to what could be the source of this problem. Thank you and all the best, Michael Müller

2 1

Problems with the ET tutorial
by Francesco Geroni 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

Hello there! I'm trying to configure ET for the first time and there's an annoying error which I can't resolve. During the compilation of the CactusTutorial I came up with the problem in the figure. I tried to eliminate the folder "simulations" (not knowing if it is a good idea) but with no succeed. What can I do? Thanks in advance and best regars; Geroni Francesco

2 3

R: Problems with the ET tutorial
by Francesco Geroni 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

1 0

The following grid structure consistency check failed: Synchronisation and boundary prolongation
by Ferguson, Deborah 25 Mar '21

25 Mar '21

I submitted a simulation on Stampede that ran for several days (1024.4 M) before failing with multiple errors of the form: [ml=0 rl=10 c=13] The following grid structure consistency check failed: Synchronisation and boundary prolongation: All points must have been received needrecv.empty() Does anyone know why this may have happened after running for so long? I’ve attached for the most recent output, the .err file, the .out file, the parameter file, grid.asc, and the ShiftTracker files. Let me know if anything else would be useful. Thanks for any thoughts you might have! Best, Deborah -------------------------------------- Deborah Ferguson Post Doc University of Texas at Austin

2 2

Proposed (not implemented) improvement to TerminationTrigger
by Gabriele Bozzola 25 Mar '21

25 Mar '21

Hi, I don't have time to do this myself at the moment, but I think it would be very useful to be able to ask TerminationTrigger to trigger termination at a multiple of a given iteration. The main application for this is ReadInterpolate. I am trying to use the thorn to change some fundamental parameters of the simulation of my ongoing runs. ReadInterpolate requires the checkpoints to be all at the same time. The checkpoints my simulations naturally produce do not fulfill this requirement, so what I have to do is to do a small run with cctk_itlast set to a number I manually have to compute so that all the refinement levels are synced. This is doable, but rather inconvenient to do every time. The change I propose is to introduce a range of "termination times" to TerminationTrigger instead of a single value (on_remaining_walltime). The idea is that as soon as the remaining walltime is less than the lower end of the range, TerminationTrigger will terminate only when the iteration is a multiple of a specified value. If the the high end of the range is reached, than this condition is no longer checked and the termination is triggered immediately (current behavior). Similarly, it would be nice to add a new sentinel value to the termination file. E.g., if I write the number 2 in the termination file, then TerminationTrigger will stop at the first iteration that is multiple of the given value instead of stopping immediately. I think that these changes would be rather simple to implement, and if the default value for "terminate_at_multiple_of" is set to 1, then they would be backwards compatible. At the moment, I cannot implement these changes myself, but I leave the idea here as a suggestion for future improvements. If anyone has a better way to do what I want to do, I'd be happy to hear that. Best, Gabriele

2 1

Einstein Toolkit Meeting Reminder
by users＠einsteintoolkit.org 24 Mar '21

24 Mar '21

Hello, Please consider joining the weekly Einstein Toolkit phone call at 9:00 am US central time on Thursdays. For details on how to connect and what agenda items are to be discussed, use the link below. ** DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME WARNING ** Please note that the US has already transitioned to / from daylight savings time. The phone call will be at 15:00 Central EU time. https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/Main_Page#Weekly_Users_Call --The Maintainers

1 0

Agenda for Thursday's Meeting
by users＠einsteintoolkit.org 22 Mar '21

22 Mar '21

Please update the Wiki with agenda items for Thursday's meeting. Thanks! https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/meeting_agenda --The Maintainers

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

Users March 2021