-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
two releases ago (Oersted) we deprecated the old interface. In the last release the default was changed to no longer support the old interface.
Should we (in the upcoming release) fully remove the old interface?
The old interface is extremely slow (since for each grid point there is a call to CCTK_IsThornActive()) and relies on StaticConformal (which almost no other thorn supports and which will likely break in unpredictable ways).
Any opinions on this? Or is this too late to remove functionality and we should instead do so immediately after the next release?
Yours, Roland
- -- My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net.
On 16 Oct 2013, at 21:52, Roland Haas roland.haas@physics.gatech.edu wrote:
Signed PGP part Hello all,
two releases ago (Oersted) we deprecated the old interface. In the last release the default was changed to no longer support the old interface.
Should we (in the upcoming release) fully remove the old interface?
The old interface is extremely slow (since for each grid point there is a call to CCTK_IsThornActive()) and relies on StaticConformal (which almost no other thorn supports and which will likely break in unpredictable ways).
Any opinions on this? Or is this too late to remove functionality and we should instead do so immediately after the next release?
Major changes should happen immediately after a release, so that people working on trunk find all the bugs, and they don't end up in the release. This doesn't usually happen, because people are "burnt out" after a release, and then procrastinate this sort of thing until they remember that there is a release coming, and maybe they should get their changes in...
Hello all,
Major changes should happen immediately after a release, so that people working on trunk find all the bugs, and they don't end up in the release. This doesn't usually happen, because people are "burnt out" after a release, and then procrastinate this sort of thing until they remember that there is a release coming, and maybe they should get their changes in...
Fine with me. I'll make a note to remove the functionality (very) shortly after the release.
Yours, Roland
users@lists.einsteintoolkit.org