Please consider joining the weekly Einstein Toolkit phone call at 9:30 am US central time on Mondays. As usual, you can find instructions how to join on the following web site:
http://einsteintoolkit.org/community/support/
We use a Google hangout, with an URL announced on this list about 15 minutes before the meeting.
*****
Please note that most of Europe (and maybe also other parts of the world) changed to Summer time this weekend, which means for those, the meeting time is now the regular time again, after being offset for the last two weeks.
*****
Frank Löffler
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 07:42:12PM -0500, Frank Loeffler wrote:
We use a Google hangout, with an URL announced on this list about 15 minutes before the meeting.
https://hangouts.google.com/call/jrkin5gvdnajtmzlgkujubjbmae
Frank
Hi
Present were: Bhavesh, Elo, Erik, Frank, Gwyneth, Ian H., Peter, Roberto, Steven, and Vassili
Status on KNLs Some independently developed optionlists exist, but none are production-ready: - Erik's optionlist on Cori: in branch in simfactory2 - Frank will put his option list into simfactory. - Eloisa has one for Marconi + KNL, and will also put it in simfactory.
Test suites and Jenkins: - Erik: optimizations on "jenkins" use optimization, performance difference ~8% - discussion about - whether to use optimizations or not / whether 8% are ok to loose - whether optimizations "dangerous" or not. - result for now: try to see if testsuites are broken and fix, if possible. - Eloisa will look at boostedpuncture test case - Roland will look at Spec test suites - Frank &| Roland will have a look at the hydro failure
Piraha CST parsing (Stev): - caching parse-tree cuts down time practically to 0 - files holding cache (one per ccl file) will be within configurations - plan: new ticket, branch, eventually inclusion - parallelism problematic with Perl, but may not be needed anyway
Gwyneth asked: - Constraints: what/how to use to calculate? - ML_AMD_Contstraints: uses ADM constraints, independent of evolution system - McLachlan: uses BSSN variables, no need to calculate ADM variables result: It does (and should) not really matter. Preferences for one or the other exist, and may depend on particular simulation specifics, but both should get the results to within numerical accuracy. - What thorn to use for which output type (basic/scalar/ascii) (Frank: It would probably be good to have this as overview on a page or so.) - Question about comment in bbh gallery example par file: "SummationByParts::sbp_upwind_deriv": not required for that parameter file would drop order of derivatives near boundary in some cases, but derivatives are not used here - ADMMass: how to measure - using initial data output (but that might differ from the one on the finite comp. grid) - ADMMass thorn: surface integral or - ADMMass thorn: volume integral (but needs thorn not in the toolkit to excise BHs) or - QuasiLocalMeasures: surface integral - time refinement factors on coarse grids - Stricter requirements on time step on very coarse grids than regular cfl factor may lead to instabilities (gauge evolution in particular). - Result: don't need to use if no instability seen.
Frank
users@lists.einsteintoolkit.org