On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:37:59AM +0000, schnetter@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
Add CactusTest arrangement, which contains many good test cases.
Do all the testcases pass?
Frank
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Frank Loeffler knarf@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:37:59AM +0000, schnetter@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
Add CactusTest arrangement, which contains many good test cases.
Do all the testcases pass?
D'oh.
-erik
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Frank Loeffler knarf@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:37:59AM +0000, schnetter@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
Add CactusTest arrangement, which contains many good test cases.
Do all the testcases pass?
They all pass except those of TestArrays, which tests 4d arrays. Something causes a segfault in PUGH. Is anybody inclined to investigate?
-erik
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:35:23AM -0500, Erik Schnetter wrote:
They all pass except those of TestArrays, which tests 4d arrays. Something causes a segfault in PUGH. Is anybody inclined to investigate?
Me not right now, maybe a bit later.
Before adding them again I would also like to have this discussed on the mailing list, as discussed on Monday.
Frank
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Frank Loeffler knarf@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:35:23AM -0500, Erik Schnetter wrote:
They all pass except those of TestArrays, which tests 4d arrays. Something causes a segfault in PUGH. Is anybody inclined to investigate?
Me not right now, maybe a bit later.
Before adding them again I would also like to have this discussed on the mailing list, as discussed on Monday.
Yes, that would be good. See my email "Patch: Add CactusTest arrangement to Einstein Toolkit" from June 23, 2010.
-erik
users@lists.einsteintoolkit.org
-
Erik Schnetter -
Frank Loeffler