Hi,
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 08:25:12AM -0500, Erik Schnetter wrote:
I think GetComponents should be handled in the same way, and would omit the symlink.
I wouldn't know how to do that without just coping GetComponents and not having it in a repository.
What may be a good idea is to introduce a "bin" directory in the Cactus source tree and put copies/links of all the tools there.
I agree with that. It would be kind of strange to have both bin/ and exe/ (I don't like the name exe/ so much anyway), but I think we could live with that.
Who has write permission to the github repository? It is always good if one or two external people (i.e. Einstein Toolkit maintainers that are not the main tool developers) have write permission as well in cases of emergency.
I think I should have, but never tried. Eric should probably also give you, and a couple of other maintainers access - but I guess he needs to know your github id for that.
- Deleting the svn version of GetComponents in utils/Scripts.
I would not delete it. At the very least I would replace it with a script which prints a message pointing to the new location.
Frank