On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Erik Schnetter schnetter@cct.lsu.eduwrote:
The current implementation of the CCZ4 formulation in McLachlan contains the expression (2/phi) in the definition of R[li,lj]. However, the meaning of phi depends on the conformalMethod, and this is not explicitly taken into account here. Is this wrong?
So far, the CCZ4 formulation has only been tested with the W conformal method. In principal it should work, but given that it hasn't really been tested it is possible that there are bugs. In this case, this looks like a bug to me and this term should be different if the W conformal method is not used. Given how close we are to a release, should we just add a note to the release notes (or elsewhere) stating that only the W method currently works?
Barry