6 Dec
2010
6 Dec
'10
8:18 a.m.
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Frank Loeffler knarf@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:58:45AM -0600, Steven R. Brandt wrote:
Do we have to call them components? Given that we're touting Cactus as a component-based framework in which the components are the thorns it seems awkward to use component for a group of thorns.
'Components' is a trac-terminology. But even if that would not be the case, there are non-Cactus components like the website, simfactory or GetComponents - and hopefully also some non-Cactus codes in the future, so I think we should avoid calling this thorns or arrangements.
Subsystem? Problem area? Module? Unit? Section?
Of these, I like "section" best.
-erik
--
Erik Schnetter schnetter@cct.lsu.edu http://www.cct.lsu.edu/~eschnett/