On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Frank Loeffler knarf@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:43:26PM -0700, Roland Haas wrote:
Hello Frank,
Log: misplaced a paper by ... a century
Would you mind checking the title, please? It uses both "Ueber" and "Auflösung". Same for the other one with Nåherung for the other paper.
I know, I noticed this myself before I committed. It is exactly like that in the original article.
Also the new entries use utf-8 which the old ones don't eg your name is L{"o}ffler in the ET paper.
utf-8 is standard nowadays, isn't it? We use utf-8 in paper for quite a while now.
It works in latex, but not in bibtex. Unfortunately I don't recall what went wrong. I do recall that I switched my personal bibtex file to utf-8, and then had to backpedal and convert everything back again. Note there are a host of tools that read bibtex entries, e.g. for sorting, combining, filtering, or for converting to html etc. -- maybe some of them are broken? Or maybe there are some broken bibtex styles around; when one submits to a journal, often particular styles are required.
I've been using utf-8 in latex itself for many years without problems.
-erik