17 Aug
2010
17 Aug
'10
10:39 a.m.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:14:56PM -0500, Erik Schnetter wrote:
I think EOS_Omni is too young for that: if people need to do something completely different and bypass EOS_Omni, then there is something wrong with EOS_Omni.
I agree that we can wait with a decision here, but I don't agree with this argument.
What I have in mind is someone who wants to use a private EOS together with EOS_Omni, without having to maintain a private copy of EOS_Omni himself. I don't think that would be an unreasonable request.
Frank