On 18 Aug 2014 15:41, "Erik Schnetter" schnetter@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Frank Loeffler knarf@cct.lsu.edu
wrote:
I might be wrong, but didn't we want GRHydro+GRHydro_Initdata as one "GRHydro" arrangement?
I don't recall this decision. Do you have a pointer to the discussion?
I know that it is difficult to place GRHydro_InitData into a particular
arrangement, but at the same time, reducing the number of arrangements is also important.
As far as I remember this was suggested because GRHydro is internally a git repository, so it doesn't seem sensible to convert it to separate svn repositories only to convert back to git and merge again. I think the suggestion was to instead just directly use the GRHydro git repository.
Barry