Hello Eloisa,
sorry for the delay in the reply. For the records I did manage to compile and run ET on KNL (stampede), but I did not manage to run any benchmark with it yet. The current status is:
* intel-17: the compiler fails to compile Carpet and either gives an internal error or segfaults. * gcc-6.3: used to compile and run with Erik's spack installation (it is currently broken). I did not really manage to benchmark it since even a low-resolution TOV test did not run to completion (meaning less than 4 coarse grid steps) within 30 minutes on 4 nodes.
This was using the current stable release of the ET (2016-11) and WhiskyTHC. You might have more luck with GRHydro / pure-vacuum runs.
Best wishes,
David
On Feb 22, 2017, at 5:53 PM, Haas, Roland rhaas@illinois.edu wrote:
Hello Eloisa,
yup, widely off. David with Erik's help had a try at ET on KNL (stampede) and you can find some information here: https://docs.einsteintoolkit.org/et-docs/2017_MHD_Workshop
Yours, Roland
-- My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net.
From: users-bounces@einsteintoolkit.org [users-bounces@einsteintoolkit.org] on behalf of Eloisa Bentivegna [eloisa.bentivegna@ct.infn.it] Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 16:24 To: Einstein Toolkit Users Subject: [Users] ET on KNL.
Dear all,
I was wondering if anybody is using the ET on the Knights Landing architecture, and what sort of performance one could expect to get. Admittedly without much optimization, I am measuring a performance per core which is almost two orders of magnitude smaller than that of a Broadwell Xeon. Does this sound wildly off?
Eloisa _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users