3 Dec
2010
3 Dec
'10
9:21 a.m.
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Ian Hinder ian.hinder@aei.mpg.de wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense for NoMPI to provide the usual mpi.h header so that authors of thorns which call MPI don't need to know anything about the particular implementation they are using?
Yes, this is my long-term goal. At the moment, only a subset of MPI is supported, and to avoid confusion I've made it explicit whether a thorn requires full MPI or this substitute. (Also, to prevent confusion between which mpi.h file is included, I would probably call it cctk_mpi.h.)
-erik
--
Erik Schnetter schnetter@cct.lsu.edu http://www.cct.lsu.edu/~eschnett/