Hi,
Something totally unimportant (is it?) I forgot to bring up at today's call is a name for the new release.
We already had
ET_2010_06 aka Bohr ET_2010_11 aka Chandrasekhar
The new release will be ET_2011_05, and we cannot just yet use "Maxwell" - hopefully next release for obvious reasons.
The suggestion of office LSU J202 (Peter and Frank) is following our "tradition" of choosing physicists, we could relate it to one of the larger changes this release, plus it comes next in the alphabet:
Dirac
Any comments, or other suggestions?
Frank
hilbert
On 4/18/11 12:45 PM, "Frank Loeffler" knarf@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
Hi,
Something totally unimportant (is it?) I forgot to bring up at today's call is a name for the new release.
We already had
ET_2010_06 aka Bohr ET_2010_11 aka Chandrasekhar
The new release will be ET_2011_05, and we cannot just yet use "Maxwell" - hopefully next release for obvious reasons.
The suggestion of office LSU J202 (Peter and Frank) is following our "tradition" of choosing physicists, we could relate it to one of the larger changes this release, plus it comes next in the alphabet:
Dirac
Any comments, or other suggestions?
Frank
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
How about a female scientist for a change; e.g. Emmy Noether.
Like the alphabet idea but then might be constrained by it in the future.
-- Gabrielle Allen Associate Professor Department of Computer Science Louisiana State University gallen@cct.lsu.edu
On Apr 18, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Frank Loeffler wrote:
Hi,
Something totally unimportant (is it?) I forgot to bring up at today's call is a name for the new release.
We already had
ET_2010_06 aka Bohr ET_2010_11 aka Chandrasekhar
The new release will be ET_2011_05, and we cannot just yet use "Maxwell" - hopefully next release for obvious reasons.
The suggestion of office LSU J202 (Peter and Frank) is following our "tradition" of choosing physicists, we could relate it to one of the larger changes this release, plus it comes next in the alphabet:
Dirac
Any comments, or other suggestions?
Frank
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Curie
On 4/18/11 12:51 PM, Allen Gabrielle wrote:
How about a female scientist for a change; e.g. Emmy Noether.
Like the alphabet idea but then might be constrained by it in the future.
-- Gabrielle Allen Associate Professor Department of Computer Science Louisiana State University gallen@cct.lsu.edu
On Apr 18, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Frank Loeffler wrote:
Hi,
Something totally unimportant (is it?) I forgot to bring up at today's call is a name for the new release.
We already had
ET_2010_06 aka Bohr ET_2010_11 aka Chandrasekhar
The new release will be ET_2011_05, and we cannot just yet use "Maxwell" - hopefully next release for obvious reasons.
The suggestion of office LSU J202 (Peter and Frank) is following our "tradition" of choosing physicists, we could relate it to one of the larger changes this release, plus it comes next in the alphabet:
Dirac
Any comments, or other suggestions?
Frank
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
I like the idea.
I am worried that going alphabetically will almost certainly force us to go with "Einstein" soon...
-erik
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Allen Gabrielle gallen@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
How about a female scientist for a change; e.g. Emmy Noether.
Like the alphabet idea but then might be constrained by it in the future.
-- Gabrielle Allen Associate Professor Department of Computer Science Louisiana State University gallen@cct.lsu.edu
On Apr 18, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Frank Loeffler wrote:
Hi,
Something totally unimportant (is it?) I forgot to bring up at today's call is a name for the new release.
We already had
ET_2010_06 aka Bohr ET_2010_11 aka Chandrasekhar
The new release will be ET_2011_05, and we cannot just yet use "Maxwell" - hopefully next release for obvious reasons.
The suggestion of office LSU J202 (Peter and Frank) is following our "tradition" of choosing physicists, we could relate it to one of the larger changes this release, plus it comes next in the alphabet:
Dirac
Any comments, or other suggestions?
Frank
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Einstein may refer to Einstein's wife as well if we only use the surname. There are many documentaries showing that she might have contributed to his theories. :)
Regards, Jian On 04/18/2011 12:03 PM, Erik Schnetter wrote:
I like the idea.
I am worried that going alphabetically will almost certainly force us to go with "Einstein" soon...
-erik
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Allen Gabriellegallen@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
How about a female scientist for a change; e.g. Emmy Noether.
Like the alphabet idea but then might be constrained by it in the future.
-- Gabrielle Allen Associate Professor Department of Computer Science Louisiana State University gallen@cct.lsu.edu
On Apr 18, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Frank Loeffler wrote:
Hi,
Something totally unimportant (is it?) I forgot to bring up at today's call is a name for the new release.
We already had
ET_2010_06 aka Bohr ET_2010_11 aka Chandrasekhar
The new release will be ET_2011_05, and we cannot just yet use "Maxwell" - hopefully next release for obvious reasons.
The suggestion of office LSU J202 (Peter and Frank) is following our "tradition" of choosing physicists, we could relate it to one of the larger changes this release, plus it comes next in the alphabet:
Dirac
Any comments, or other suggestions?
Frank
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Well, in that sense: Curie is next.
On 4/18/11 1:03 PM, Erik Schnetter wrote:
I like the idea.
I am worried that going alphabetically will almost certainly force us to go with "Einstein" soon...
-erik
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Allen Gabriellegallen@cct.lsu.edu wrote:
How about a female scientist for a change; e.g. Emmy Noether.
Like the alphabet idea but then might be constrained by it in the future.
-- Gabrielle Allen Associate Professor Department of Computer Science Louisiana State University gallen@cct.lsu.edu
On Apr 18, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Frank Loeffler wrote:
Hi,
Something totally unimportant (is it?) I forgot to bring up at today's call is a name for the new release.
We already had
ET_2010_06 aka Bohr ET_2010_11 aka Chandrasekhar
The new release will be ET_2011_05, and we cannot just yet use "Maxwell" - hopefully next release for obvious reasons.
The suggestion of office LSU J202 (Peter and Frank) is following our "tradition" of choosing physicists, we could relate it to one of the larger changes this release, plus it comes next in the alphabet:
Dirac
Any comments, or other suggestions?
Frank
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0500, Frank Loeffler wrote:
Something totally unimportant (is it?) I forgot to bring up at today's call is a name for the new release.
We had so far two votes for each of Dirac and Noether, and one each for Curie and Mileva Einstein.
Please - if you didn't express your wishes - decide for one of them to get us to a result.
Frank
I vote for Curie.
Frank Loeffler wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0500, Frank Loeffler wrote:
Something totally unimportant (is it?) I forgot to bring up at today's call is a name for the new release.
We had so far two votes for each of Dirac and Noether, and one each for Curie and Mileva Einstein.
Please - if you didn't express your wishes - decide for one of them to get us to a result.
Frank
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
My vote is for Nöther.
Best, Colby — LSU Center for Computation & Technology User Support | Johnston 232 | aim: colbyatcct
Sent from Baton Rouge, LA, United States On Wednesday 20 April 2011 at 8.44, Frank Loeffler wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:45:20AM -0500, Frank Loeffler wrote:
Something totally unimportant (is it?) I forgot to bring up at today's call is a name for the new release.
We had so far two votes for each of Dirac and Noether, and one each for Curie and Mileva Einstein.
Please - if you didn't express your wishes - decide for one of them to get us to a result.
Frank _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hello all,
Please - if you didn't express your wishes - decide for one of them to get us to a result.
Curie
Yours, Roland
Noether
On 4/20/11 3:45 PM, Roland Haas wrote:
Hello all,
Please - if you didn't express your wishes - decide for one of them to get us to a result.
Curie
Yours, Roland
I vote for Dirac. Constraints stimulate creativity.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Jennifer Seiler jennifer.a.seiler@nasa.gov wrote:
Noether
On 4/20/11 3:45 PM, Roland Haas wrote:
Hello all,
Please - if you didn't express your wishes - decide for one of them to get us to a result.
Curie
Yours, Roland
-- Jennifer Seiler Personal: jenn.seiler@gmail.com Work: jennifer.a.seiler@nasa.gov Mobile: 1 (571) 228-0438
"To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children; to earn the appreciation of honest critics and endure the betrayal of false friends; to appreciate beauty; to find the best in others; to leave the world a bit better, whether by a garden patch or a redeemed social condition; to know even one life has breathed easier because you have lived. This is to have succeeded." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Noether indeed. :)
Eloisa
On Apr 20, 2011, at 10:06 PM, Jennifer Seiler wrote:
Noether
On 4/20/11 3:45 PM, Roland Haas wrote:
Hello all,
Please - if you didn't express your wishes - decide for one of them to get us to a result.
Curie
Yours, Roland
-- Jennifer Seiler Personal: jenn.seiler@gmail.com Work: jennifer.a.seiler@nasa.gov Mobile: 1 (571) 228-0438
"To laugh often and much; to win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children; to earn the appreciation of honest critics and endure the betrayal of false friends; to appreciate beauty; to find the best in others; to leave the world a bit better, whether by a garden patch or a redeemed social condition; to know even one life has breathed easier because you have lived. This is to have succeeded." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
users@lists.einsteintoolkit.org
-
Allen Gabrielle -
Bruno C. Mundim -
Carlos Lousto -
Colby Jordan -
David Rideout -
Eloisa Bentivegna -
Erik Schnetter -
Frank Loeffler -
Jennifer Seiler -
Jian Tao -
Manuela Campanelli -
Roland Haas