This page also doesn't say how to cite the flesh, i.e. Cactus itself:

@InProceedings{Goodale2002a, author = {Tom Goodale and Gabrielle Allen and Gerd Lanfermann and Joan Mass{'o} and Thomas Radke and Edward Seidel and John Shalf}, title = {The {Cactus} Framework and Toolkit: Design and Applications}, booktitle = {Vector and Parallel Processing -- VECPAR'2002, 5th International Conference, Lecture Notes in Computer Science}, year = 2003, address = {Berlin}, publisher = {Springer}, url = {http://edoc.mpg.de/3341%7D, }

In addition to these papers, we often also cite the corresponding web sites, since this is useful for people: cactuscode.org, carpetcode.org, einsteintoolkit.org, etc.

-erik

On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Ian Hinder ian.hinder@aei.mpg.de wrote:

On 16 Jul 2011, at 18:50, Steven R. Brandt wrote:

...

Ram asked for the best references to Cactus / Carpet / Kranc for purposes of citing in a paper he's writing. What would we prefer he cite?

See

http://einsteintoolkit.org/documentation/licenses/

For some reason, Kranc is not listed there.  Citing instructions for Kranc are on the Kranc web page:  http://kranccode.org/.

-- Ian Hinder ian.hinder@aei.mpg.de

---

Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users